WWE Hell in a Cell 2010 Review

[hellsonlychild]

[blairpwnsall]

I actually thought Paul would betrayed taker at BR and costing taker the title. But tbh if taker and Kane would've use the cage more and made the match a little faster it would've been better. I also would've given the Orton Shemus match a four and triple threat 4.5 cause my rating system is 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5 so yeah I thought this was defentally one of the better ppvs of the year.

[hellsonlychild]

Oct 3, 2010 23:48:05 GMT -5 @blairpwnsall said:

I actually thought Paul would betrayed taker at BR and costing taker the title. But tbh if taker and Kane would've use the cage more and made the match a little faster it would've been better. I also would've given the Orton Shemus match a four and triple threat 4.5 cause my rating system is 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5 so yeah I thought this was defentally one of the better ppvs of the year.

No dude the rating 0-5 with .25 increments

[blairpwnsall]

Eh I like mind so no one can ask me wats the difference between an 4.75 and a 4.768438589537963804 cause I don't have enough time to explain it.

[Jiggas]

Yeh i thought the PPV was ok wasnt the best.

WWE should not do hell in a cell matches anymore whilst there PG because the hell in the cell is meant to be used as a weapon in my opinion.

best match was the definitely the opening match so i agree with you on that.